Effects of etiological factors on different treatment methods in dentin hypersensitivity

Güngör FS, Karabekiroğlu S, Ünlü N.
Int J Dent Heal Sci. 2017;04(05):956-970.

Objectives

Elimination of etiological factors is great importance in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). The aim of this study is to compare the effect of DH etiology and risk factors on different treatment methods [5% sodium fluoride (Duraphat fluoride varnish), 5% glutaraldehyde-35% hydroxyethyl methacrylate (Gluma desensitizer), 8% arginine and calcium carbonate-containing desensitizing paste (Pro-Argin) and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser].

Methods

40 patients (16 male and 24 females) with 200 teeth affected by DH and bruxism were included in this study. The patients were divided into two main groups. In the first group, there were patients who could not regularly use the night guard for bruxism due to individual reasons, and who could not complied advices on nutrition and oral hygiene habits (Group-A). The second group consisted of patients who could regularly use the night guard and could complied advices (Group-B). Then, both groups were divided into five subgroups: Group 1: Duraphat fluoride varnish, Group 2: Gluma desensitizer, Group 3: Pro-Argin, Group 4: Er:YAG laser Group 5: Control. DH was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS); before the treatment, immediately, 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the treatment. The obtained data were evaluated statistically.

Results

In both groups, it was seen that the most effective treatment methods were the Er:YAG laser and Pro-Argin. Gluma desensitizer and Duraphat fluoride varnish were also found to be effective in DH compared with control group, but they were not found to be as successful as the Er:YAG laser and Pro-Argin in the long term. It was found that all treatment methods, including the control group, applied to Group-B significantly increased their activities compared to Group-A in the 4 and 12 weeks (p<0.05).

Conclusions

It has been found that the success rates of all treatment methods are increased when the etiological factor can be eliminated. It was also observed that Er:YAG laser and Pro-Argin demonstrated statistically similar success rates in both groups. It was seen that Er:YAG laser and Pro-Argin could have hope for long-term DH treatment.

EFFECTS OF ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS ON DIFFERENT TREATMENT METHODS IN DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY